John van Vlaanderen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Haha, I thought so, > > Eric wrote: > > I have used it enough at this point I don't want to live without it > > again. > > I did spend the better part of last night reading the thread, though > that got to the why but not how. > > Uses registers, not stacks -- like the Perl6 Parrot VM, I am going to > have to tell them :)
Actually quite a bit different. Parrot will just not use stack oriented byte codes. But a call/return stack will still be required. romcc does not use a call/return stack, but romcc still implement subroutines. Eric _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
