On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:49, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > For the rest who haven't looked so closely. > Greg and Ron are taking the existing superio model and generalizing it. > > I have taken the existing pci device model and generalized it. > > And now we have the design review/fight/slug out as we meet in > the middle. > > I suspect the union of the two sets of functions from struct > device_operations and from the superio side is two high. But the way > forward is to get that union and have everyone understand the pieces > backwards and forwards. >
I still don't see the point of the dispute. In the PCI model, you make the operations (functions) a separated entity and in the superio model, the operations are embedded in the data structure. Is there any fundamental or design conflict between these two ? -- ollie lho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
