Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > In addition to lowering the number of resets it would also be possible > to use an LDTSTOP (as I implemented it in older versions of the CVS) > at least when doing the hypertransport link changes. > I know that this does not work with some preproduction CPUs, but I don't > think that would really matter. BUT: Could we get rid of all CPU resets > when doing an LDTSTOP assertion (It's a lot quicker than a hard reset) > or would we still need to reset the CPU for some other reasons?
When I was working with it I remember seeing some additional remaining errata with regards to LDTSTOP. So I decided not to mess with it. There does seem to be a big delay in the phase that finds the rom chip though. Eric _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
