Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * YhLu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031125 03:37]: > > Stefan, > > > > I'm porting Tyan S4880 now. I found that the following building err, do you > > meet it in AMD board? > > No, the AMD boards build fine for me. > gcc-3.3.1-29 > binutils-2.14.90.0.6-8 > > > Even I only enable the CPU0's memctrl in the auto.c > > It seems the struct itself in auto.c is pretty uncritical for size. > Other parts like the log level need a lot more tuning if you want the > image to be as verbose as possible.
I think that is more because changing the loglevel is something we have real control over. I think most of the bloat is in auto.c but I have not gone back and looked for a while. Before the memory controller setup was called in a loop it made a real difference if you setup 1 memory controller or 2 because both calls were inlined. With the loop the memory controller code is only inlined once no matter how many memory controllers you have. > * Do you compile with romcc -O (not -O0 and not -O2) Hmm. -O2 should work and better than -O. I know it was broken for a while... > guess the size issue should be mentioned in the docs. Everybody > fiddling with LinuxBIOS on AMD64 _has_ seen it.. Yes. And this is why I keep working on making inlining optional in romcc. Eric _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
