On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 11:54, Egbert Eich wrote: > Stefan Reinauer writes: > > * Li-Ta Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040909 18:26]: > > > Did they do anything on the "core" x86emu? Last time I checked, > > > XF86 4.4.0 has almost the same x86emu as testbios. > > > > Yes. But not only the x86 emulation itself is interesting, but also the > > legacy bios emulation around it. There are so many branches and forks > > out there, we _have_ to do something to unite them, otherwise we cannot > > reach our goal in this area. Nobody knows what the others are really > > doing. > > > > I am going to set up an GNU Arch repository on openbios.org asap so we > > can set a starting point for development. > > > > We need some clarification on what parts belong in this repository, and > > which ones don't. Like, where do the PCI access functions go, logically, > > in this picture? > > > > In the Scitech repository there are already two things: the CPU emulator > and the PC environment. Both reside in separate directories. > The directory structure needs to be changed (in a smart way so that > resyncing with scitech isn't an issue and the emulator can be used > separately) and the PC environment needs to be cleaned up and enhanced. >
In your X.org CVS log, you said you resync with Scitech's code. Is it the 0.8 from their ftp site or something else ? Ollie _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
