On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 16:53, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Ronald G. Minnich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Li-Ta Lo wrote: > > > > > Since it appears nobody is maintaining FILO do you think we should put > > > it in util directory in freebios2? > > > > > > > that's my plan. > > Please let's give it's own namespace, just like freebios2 has. > Or at least could we start a util tree for these kinds of things. > > I'd like to keep the parts that are independent of the LinuxBIOS > revision a little separate so if we ever need to do something > like the freebios2 tree again they can happily live again. > > Romcc and config.g and one or two other utilities are tightly tied > to the LinuxBIOS revisions so the make a lot of sense. >
I think we should move most of the utils into its own util package. The config tool should be move to a new directory call "tools" in freebios2. Ollie _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
