Li-Ta Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Eric, > > Why there is no > struct southbridge_amd_amd8131_config > or > struct southbridge_amd_amd8151_config
Because they don't need an enable_dev method. > in ter static.c although we have > chip southbridge/amd/amd8131 > and > chip southbridge/amd/amd8151 > > in the Config.lb? The chips are found by their pci_ids. > There is no > struct chip_operations southbridge_amd_amd8131_ops > nor > struct chip_operations southbridge_amd_amd8151_ops > nether. Currently struct xxxxx_config and struct chip_operations xxx_ops are tied together. If you have you have both. We don't currently require a struct chip_operations. I have not thought enough about this to know if it is a good or a bad thing. It is simply the way it was done and I have not changed it. If we always required this we could remove the config directive from the configuration language. Eric _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
