Pardon me but, am I to understand that XML is implemented in a firmware environment?!
Steve M On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Florian Zeitz wrote: > Stefan Reinauer wrote: > > > Ok, I checked the script into the arch repository now, utils/optionlist. > > > >I changed the xsl sheet slightly so it works with my version of xsltproc > >and saxon. Which xsl processor are you using? > > > >Thanks for your work > > > >Stefan > > > > > > > To be honest I tried so many different xsl processors that I really > can't remember what I finally used. > I think it was a good idea to make it XSLT 1.0 (again (I had it written > in XSLT 1.0 first, too) as it seems a lot more processors can handle it. > You might want to completely remove the xsl:choose stuff (so basically > what is commented right now) it was a hack to get the xml (the > unprocessed of course) to show correctly in firefox and is specific to > XSLT 2.0 anyway because it uses xhtml as method. > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxBIOS mailing list > LinuxBIOS@openbios.org > http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios > _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios