Tyson D Sawyer wrote: > > This morning while in the shower it came to me what the +1 was for in > Ollie's mtrr code. It is a rounding issue and my proposed changes will > fail for anything that needs more than 1 mtrr. > > I think that the correct version is: > > range_wb = 1 << (fms(ramsizeK - 1) + 1); > range_uc = range_wb - ramsizeK; > > if ((range_uc==0) || ((ramsizeK % range_uc) == 0)) { > Committed. Ollie
- Re: Changes to mtrr code Ollie Lho
- Re: Changes to mtrr code Ronald G Minnich
- Re: Changes to mtrr code Ronald G Minnich
- Re: Changes to mtrr code tyson
- Ollie Lho