Why add more code to cover up the fact that the DBG macro is
inappropriately always using the _DEBUG loglevel?  Why not just get rid of
the macro and use printk with whatever the priority you want is?  If
there's seven log levels and everybody's using #7, why not start using 1-6
instead of adding two more?

Admittedly, though, it might make sense to rename some of the loglevels so
that they make more sense in this context-- there's probably no need for
four distinct levels of error in linuxbios (where most errors are probably
critical, failing to boot the system).

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 02:57:46PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> While doing some debugging I found that I had something close to an all
> or nothing option for debug output.  ...and all was a LOT!
> 
> As a result I made the following changes to printk.h:
> 
> diff -ur freebios-010119.orig/src/include/printk.h 
>freebios-010119.devel/src/include/printk.h
> --- freebios-010119.orig/src/include/printk.h   Fri Dec  1 03:59:46 2000
> +++ freebios-010119.devel/src/include/printk.h  Fri Jan 19 14:48:57 2001
> @@ -10,15 +10,23 @@
>  #define KERN_WARNING    "<4>"   /* warning conditions                   */
>  #define KERN_NOTICE     "<5>"   /* normal but significant condition     */
>  #define KERN_INFO       "<6>"   /* informational                        */
> -#define KERN_DEBUG      "<7>"   /* debug-level messages                 */
> +#define KERN_VERBOSE    "<7>"   /* debug-level messages                 */
> +#define KERN_DEBUG      "<8>"   /* debug-level messages                 */
> +#define KERN_SPEW       "<9>"   /* debug-level messages                 */
> 
>  extern int console_loglevel;
>  int printk(const char *fmt, ...);
> 
>  #ifdef DEBUG
>  #define DBG(x...) printk(KERN_DEBUG x)
> +#define DBG7(x...) printk(KERN_VERBOSE x)
> +#define DBG8(x...) printk(KERN_DEBUG x)
> +#define DBG9(x...) printk(KERN_SPEW x)
>  #else
>  #define DBG(x...)
> +#define DBG7(x...)
> +#define DBG8(x...)
> +#define DBG9(x...)
>  #endif
> 
>  #endif
> 
> I then went through the code and replaced most cases of DBG with one of
> the other DBG? macros.  Is this a change that is supported by others? 
> Or will people just hate me for submitting the patch?
> 
> As it stands now, level 6 provides next to nothing and level 7 blabs
> about every PCI I/O operation and tons of other stuff.
> 
> Thanks!
> Ty
> 
> -- 
> Tyson D Sawyer                             iRobot Corporation
> Senior Systems Engineer                    Real World Interface Div.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]                         Robots for the Real World
> 603-532-6900 ext 206                       http://www.irobot.com

Reply via email to