Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Stefan Reinauer wrote: > >>* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060412 06:17]: >> >>>Lu, Yinghai wrote: >>> >>> >>>>These should be DMI info ...., >>> >>>The later section (2.2 kb) really are DMI info. >>> >>>But I strongly doubt that the missing 128 kb in the middle are >>>all DMI info. Especially the fact that here flash_rom reads >>>a consecutive block of 0xff while the vendor BIOS image has >>>real contents seems the wrong way. If it were DMI info, the >>>vendor BIOS image should have the 0xff and not flash_rom. >> >>What does that content look like? > > Looks like valid x86 instructions.
I tested with awdflash and the readout of awdflash does not exhibit this bug. Any idea how to fix it in flash_rom? Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
