Peter Stuge schrieb: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:04:14PM +0200, Christian Sühs wrote: > >>should it be addl or andl, 0x9fffffff ?? > > > andl, intent is to clear bits 2,1 in the top nibble. > > > >>However I have tried both and for both cases it fails. >> >>I think is it not possible to easy write to cr0, I will try the >>patch later in the code after enabling these registers. > > > Hmm, cr0 should always be available.. > > > //Peter >
Could be the patch wrong? In cache.h the enable_cache function looks different. there is a "asm volatile" for read/write operation. movl %%cr0, %0 movl %0, %%cr0 I mean the double "%%" chris -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
