Stefan Reinauer wrote: > * Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060524 02:06]: >> Stefan Reinauer wrote: >>> * Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060523 20:09]: >>>> Ronald G Minnich wrote: >>>>> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have no platform on which LinuxBIOS runs on, but it caused no >>>>>> regression >>>>>> in abuild. (But a lot of targets do not seem to compile at all, even >>>>>> without >>>>>> my patch. Does this depend on the gcc version? I have gcc 3.3.5) >>>>> don't know, I will try to test your patch via abuild but I don't want to >>>>> commit until then. >>>> Yes, it was a gcc bug. gcc 4.1.0 has no problems compiling it. >>>> I'll continue testing and developing with gcc 4.1.0 from now on. >>> Can we get it compiling with 3.3.5 as well? What's the bug about? >>> I'm using 4.1 as a reference compiler at the moment, but lots of people >>> out there have older compilers I think... >> LinuxBIOSv2-2310/src/cpu/amd/model_gx2/cpubug.c:199:75: missing terminating >> ' character >> LinuxBIOSv2-2310/src/cpu/amd/model_gx2/cpubug.c:205:70: missing terminating >> ' character > > Indeed weird! This is in the middle of #ifdef 0?
Yes. Tom Sylla @ AMD just wrote off-list: > You can safely just remove those ticks. They are in comments in an > if 0'ed section of reference code. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
