Hi, On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 02:02:21PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > * Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060801 01:57]: > > Yes, that's what I was guessing. It should return the vendor > > and device ID (0xDA, 0x0B), correct? > > Yes, exactly.
I still had no luck with flashrom. I tried both chips on another computer now, same results. I also tried a PLCC chip (AM29F040B-120JC) on a third computer, same result too (0xFF for all queries). This seems really strange - could it be that the chips are not only "empty" but also do not have an ID hardcoded in them? I.e. is it possible that the 0xFF is actually correct? If so, I could skip the vendor ID check and just try/force writing, maybe... Cheers, Uwe. -- Uwe Hermann http://www.hermann-uwe.de http://www.it-services-uh.de | http://www.crazy-hacks.org http://www.holsham-traders.de | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
