Stefan Reinauer wrote: > > And then there's /dev/bios. It supports quite a lot of hardware > and it talks to the hardware in a smarter way than most flash drivers > in "flashrom". This is why I still get regular mails for the driver. > > But it should be all integrated in flashrom, its architecture is a lot > more sane.
Oh. I had assumed flashrom was the successor of /dev/bios and other flashing tools. Porting the code from /dev/bios to flashrom will probably be a lot easier than trying to find out what uniflash does. Stefan, do you have any plans in that direction? Regards, Carl-Daniel -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
