On 9/15/06, Peter Stuge <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to preserve this somehow. I want a place I build stuff and a place that sources live, a la BSD. I think the way Linux builds kernels
into the middle of the source tree is a real mess.
yes, kconfig has real limits, and we need to see if we can work our way around them.
ron
* Global vs. local builds - pros/cons with kernel style (global)
build (always produces arch/x/*Image) and LBv2 style build (produces
target/x/y/z/linuxbios.rom for each target) Either way the
config/build system must be consistently either global or local.
I want to preserve this somehow. I want a place I build stuff and a place that sources live, a la BSD. I think the way Linux builds kernels
into the middle of the source tree is a real mess.
* Support for target variants? Same mobo with/without certain parts
populated. Perhaps just sets of default options that can be
pre-selected as a base config and then still allow user to change
whatever they want. (Kconfig has just one variant per arch, right?)
yes, kconfig has real limits, and we need to see if we can work our way around them.
ron
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
