I don't think we should add a new variable for something that should be in the user's path. I don't think we need this patch.
thanks
ron
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
Isn't this what PATH shell variables are for? The problem is that we
have a hard-coded path, /usr/sbin/iasl, not that we need a config
variable for the path. What should happen is that the hard-coded path
should be replaced with a command name.
I don't think we should add a new variable for something that should be in the user's path. I don't think we need this patch.
thanks
ron
I don't think we should add a new variable for something that should be in the user's path. I don't think we need this patch.
thanks
ron
- [LinuxBIOS] iasl path config option. Uwe Hermann
- Re: [LinuxBIOS] iasl path config option. ron minnich
- Re: [LinuxBIOS] iasl path config option. Stefan Reinauer
- Re: [LinuxBIOS] iasl path config option. Uwe Hermann
