On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:10:50PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote: > Dave Crossland wrote: > > On 10/11/06, Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sorry bad choice of words on my part.. I meant not fully open source and > > > not totally free of binary cruft. > > > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115536806403908&w=2 > > > > Ouch. When he says, "The driver remains completely functional in the > > absense of the binary piece", surely some functionality is missing - > > what is this? I don't understand enough (yet) to know from that post > > It means that you get basic access to the device w/o being able to take > advantage of the more advanced features. Probably due to them > subcontracting a third-party to do the advanced stuff.
Anyone know what exactly the advanced stuff is? Thanks, Ward. -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
