Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> * Lu, Yinghai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061211 19:59]:
>> Is the suspend be the job of OS instead of firmware?
>
> LinuxBIOS' effort has indeed been the other way around: Move everything
> into the OS that is not necessarily a task of the firmware.
>
> Since we have this no-callback paradigm in the LLFW we should probably
> stick with that.
>
>> I wonder if kexec  or kdump could load another kernel to dump previous
>> kernel to disk partition or file.
>
> Why would you want to load another kernel first? Can you return from a
> kexec call and have the original kernel dump the virtual environment of
> the freshly loaded one?

Nope kexec has no provision for returning.

There is some small argument that standing outside the kernel might
make the problem easier, but I don't think that helps much.

Eric

-- 
linuxbios mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Reply via email to