In that case this utility program is very misleading, at least to me. Perhaps a large comment should be added to the .c file that either gives a warning that it is incomplete or tips on what to add.
Jon On 12/19/06, Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061219 19:34]: > > I'm not totally sure about this one. What we have done for a number of > > reasons is let each board define this function. I think it's for the > > usual reason -- some wacko board that breaks all the rules -- Jon, are > > you sure this works in ALL cases -- that every single board can use > > this standard function definition? > > It doesn't really matter. The PIRQ table you read out on any modern > board that comes with ACPI will not be complete, correct or working > anyways. > > Stefan > > -- > coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br. > Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://www.coresystems.de/ > > -- > linuxbios mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
