>> And typedef for struct pointers is a no-no with the v3 >> coding style (adopted from Linux); you could make an >> exception for an often-used thing like this, but this >> mail thread exemplifies why that is not such a good >> idea: you really want to know the underlying type, so >> why not write it out. > > Don't worry, there will be *NO* exceptions.
Good good, *NO* typedefs to pointer to struct. Hopefully you don't mean you won't have typedefs at all (atomic_t, u32, etc.) :-) Segher -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
