On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:49:00PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > boot-parameters {
> > console-baud { default=115200, choices={9600, 19200, etc.}}
> > something=true (use of true or false defines this as a 1/0 choice)
> > }
> >
> > and so on, is this reasonable?
>
> Yes!
>
>
> > But we will need to have dts tree parsing happening as part of make
> > config; is this ok too?
>
> I think so, it makes the obj-files-from-dts problem a lot simpler as
> well.
>
> I don't know what would be most practical however;
>
> * Generate Kconfig.dts
> * Teach Kconfig dts or dtb with hooks for select:ing based on dt[bs]
>
> Perhaps start with generating includes..Yes, Kconfig.dts sounds like the better solution, IMHO. But maybe we can even use Kconfig only for this? Do we need/want to stick that information in the dts? Why not put it into Kconfig files directly? Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
