On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 10:14:00PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 06:45:42PM +0200, Mondrian Nuessle wrote: > > While I think that a clean function interface is nice, I can live > > without it... > > So I could go with the patch, as Uwe provided it. > > > > Mondrian > > Well, as soon as this code is in, i'll put up a patch for the functions, > and you'll see that it really makes a lot of difference, even on such a > small file. 3 out of 4 board enables make use of it though.
Yep, thanks! It sounded like overkill when I read about it the first time, but I think you may be right. Please post a patch... As for _this_ patch: someone just needs to ACK it, IHMO it can be committed. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
