On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:18:12AM -0400, Tom Sylla wrote: > Uwe Hermann wrote: > >The LX-based OLPC should become another subdirectory of olpc/, just like > >rev_a and btest, right? I'd rather not touch the existing directories if > >the changes are that massive. This way we wouldn't break any targets > >(just add a new one), correct? > > For those not following OLPC closely, OFW has replaced LB as the > bootloader on OLPC, starting with B3 (the first LX version). OFW-only > was prototyped on B2, too (GX). > > Making an B3 OLPC target might be sort of an interesting exercise, but > it won't really end up getting used for anything.
Maybe it won't get shipped, but that doesn't mean it won't get used. OLPC-users/-developers can flash any firmware they like, correct? Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
