On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:47:37PM -0400, Corey Osgood wrote: > Very true, but might as well fix it anyways, since its been driving me > nuts. The current code is just wrong. Might as well have working code, > in case anyone uses it for anything in the future. Either that or we > should remove it entirely, but I'm not about to make that call (for all > I know, there could be a billion of these in a thin client somewhere). > Maybe Richard can clear up if these were ever mass produced/sold, google > turns up nothing of interest. > > > I have a P2B here, so I'll look into that. > > > > Thanks. From what I can tell, my p2-99 is a p2b with the 440zx chipset > (which is 90% identical), I just can't get to it right now. No matter > what though, these targets shouldn't be any more broken than they were > before ;)
True. Committed in r2642, I'll test on my P2B later this day... Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
