On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 03:58:40PM -0400, Corey Osgood wrote: > Hmm, why don't we just fix raminit.c and debug.c (and northbridge.c, if > applicable) for those northbridges (vt8601, vt8623, 440bx) to just use > smbus_read_byte instead of spd_read_byte? Eliminate any chance of a > problem altogether?
spd_read_byte() is the correct name, so it should stay IMO. Is there a reason why all/most boards define this as a wrapper for smbus_read_byte()? Could this be something else than smbus_read_byte() for some board? If no, maybe a #define is easier? Or move the wrapper to a central location? Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
