On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 01:55:26AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> /* Print the PCI-X bus speed. */
> - printk_debug("PCI: %02x: %s\n", dev->link[0].secondary,
> + printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "PCI: %02x: %s\n", dev->link[0].secondary,
This is not related to your modifications, but shouldn't "PCI:" be
"PCI-X:" here?
> Modified: LinuxBIOSv3/lib/stage2.c
> ===================================================================
> --- LinuxBIOSv3/lib/stage2.c 2007-05-19 21:31:23 UTC (rev 326)
> +++ LinuxBIOSv3/lib/stage2.c 2007-05-19 23:55:25 UTC (rev 327)
> @@ -43,7 +43,19 @@
> {
> /* TODO: Add comment. */
> void show_all_devs(void);
> +
> + static const char console_test[] =
> + "\n\nLinuxBIOS-"
> + LINUXBIOS_VERSION
> + LINUXBIOS_EXTRA_VERSION
> + " "
> + LINUXBIOS_BUILD
> + " booting...\n";
Is this intentionally printed twice? What you now get is this:
-----------
LinuxBIOS-3.0.0 Sun May 20 17:44:08 CEST 2007 starting...
Choosing normal boot.
LAR: Attempting to open 'normal/initram'.
RAM init code started.
Nothing to do.
Done RAM init code
LAR: Attempting to open 'normal/stage2'.
LinuxBIOS-3.0.0 Sun May 20 17:44:08 CEST 2007 booting...
Phase 1: done
Show all devs...
cpus: Unknown device path type: 0
Phase 2: Early setup...
Phase 2: Done.
-----------
(console_init() already prints the same text)
Uwe.
--
http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
