On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:20:15PM -0400, Corey Osgood wrote: > Well, as there seems to be a lot of cleaning up going on lately, might > as well add this to the docket. The attached patch removes the Bitworks > IMS, as 1) there's no video support for it, 2) no one objected when this > was discussed previously, and 3) no one seems to have one, and they > aren't readily available. Any comments are welcome. > > Signed-off-by: Corey Osgood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I tend to agree, but I'd like to hear the opinion of Richard (CC'd). Well, reason 1 and 3 are quite surely not enough to remove it, maybe not even reason 2. The reason why I agree that it can be removed is that it's almost completely copy+paste code from other targets with no real IMS-specific code which would be useful for anyone. It may be easier to just start fresh if/when the IMS shall be ported to v2. Richard, please let us know if we shall keep the code, otherwise I'll remove it in one or two days. Cheers, Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
