On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:44:36AM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote: > On 04/06/07 08:48 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > > I.e., the "full" relative path to the file being modified is included > > in the patch, so you can 'patch -p0 < ~/foo.patch' at the top-level to > > apply the patch. > > -p0? Is that seriously the standard here? Can I ask why?
No standard (or rather: not really), it's just what you get when you do 'svn diff > foo.patch' at the top-level. Either -p0 or -p1 is fine, I don't care. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
