* Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070704 18:14]:
> Yes, I fully agree. But we know the license, it's the GPLv2 for all Linux
> code except where noted otherwise (also mentioned in HACKING).
We do, but do we implicitly expect this from anyone else?
> I think the "taken from Linux" mini-header should be enough, but we can also
> make it clearer if you want:
>
> This is probably a good compromise. We list the license explicitly, and
> (only) the authors of the modifications.
> I think either the current method, or method 1 or 3 are fine.
I think 3 is the best one.. We are already going safe in so many places
(licenses for dts files and Kconfig files), so we should maybe just do
the same here.
Other opinions?
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
