Peter Stuge wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:24:12AM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > >> I used the name stage2.c for the code (not i82371xx.c) for now. >> >> Shall we do that for all our chipsets and devices? A stage1.c file >> for early init stuff, and stage2.c for the "normal" code? >> > > Does it scale? Will we be able to tell different stage2.o files from > each other when linking etc?
Good point. Should we go with stage2-82371xx.c or similar? Also, with stuff like SMBus where in v2 we have a header that stores a bunch of functions used in both "stage1" and "stage2" (example: nvidia mcp55, intel i82801xx, etc), how do we define naming of those? -Corey -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
