On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 08:05:39PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > > At least we want to change the commit trigger so abuild doesn't run > > for anything but v2 commits then. Maybe this is done already? :) > > Not for util? > > I think this is tough. If we pack lar there, v3 should definitely be > recompiled when someone changes lar.
Maybe, yes. But maybe this even works; depends on how the post-commit hooks "see" the changes in an svn:externals repo within v3. But I agree that we could change the abuild hooks to only "fire" if there was a change in the LinuxBIOSv2/ directory or below. For v3 there's no abuild at the moment anyway. > > > -- there are some tutorials on how to do that while preserving the > > > history. > > > > Do you have URLs at hand? > > It's not hard to merge two repos. It might mean that you guys all have > to do a fresh checkout though... ;) So I better want to be very sure we > all want this. Yep, if we want to take the history with us, then yes, I think we want this. > > > Yes, we would _not_ have the history in that new LinuxBIOSv3 > > > directory. But maybe it's still an option > > > > The only reason for doing it that way is to get it done. I think it > > would be nice if we could get the history over. Dunno? > > If we really do so, we want the history over, yes. Definitely. > > I'd rather go as far as moving util to the v3 tree (including history) > and pushing off v1 and v2. Uh, no, rather the other way around (merge v3 into the current v1/v2/util repo). > We seemed pretty sure we want a fresh repo and not just a fresh > directory at the linuxbios symposium last year... did the mood change > here? Yep :) Mine changed definately. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
