On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 11:21:22AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > The value of overclocking is very questionable
It has huge educational value, which is why I think it's important that LB can do it. ..or maybe not.. On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 09:55:02AM +0700, Darmawan Salihun wrote: > Yeah, agree with that ;-). It shouldn't be given to the unknowns. I disagree. Let user shoot self in foot. Maybe politely warn though. > But, what about an "overclocking/underclocking branch" for > LinuxBIOS? My idea is that these tweaks are contained in a separate piece of software. Maybe lbmenu. There's a certain point in letting LB stay LB and just do a very safe, always known-working setup. Then add fancy schmancy on top of that. This is also important because we may like to have fallback use different performance profiles. Easily done with tweaks in a payload. //Peter -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
