On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:34:21PM +0100, Matthew Bloch wrote: > Okay so now I'll try to flash the new one: > > mnas:~/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/via/epia-m/epia-m# flashrom linuxbios.rom
Add -w to actually write. We should add a message to flashrom in case no action option is specified. (-v, -r or -w) On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 07:31:12PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote: > > Do you have a working Config.lb I could look at? > > Sorry, no. It was for a pcchips board with the same chipset that I > never got going. I don't think I have the code any more. I'm afraid I've lost my working configs too. > > I cut & pasted this program: > > http://linuxbios.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2004-March/007257.html > > Good find! This should get into flashrom. flashrom does support the board, just needs -w. :) On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Matthew Bloch wrote: > I like the coloured handles. Well that does leave only one option > for recovery which is the spare board & hot plug. You can hot swap flash chips on your one EPIA-M board too - you don't really need a second board, just more flash chips, as long as you have a backup of the factory BIOS.. > Went ahead and flashed ..well, ok. :) > wiki page, replaced my 256MB stick with 512MB and after a few > seconds of hard drive clicking it came up on the network! Hooray! > So from a cold boot, the board is now available on the network in > about 30s - lame of course, I need to dig out a flash drive to fix > that :) I'm sure there's room for improvement Yep, I've gotten a 600MHz EPIA-MII to 10-or-so seconds with a fairly fat kernel. (A bunch of extra drivers that need time to init.) > but I should at least dig out a serial cable before I try to > optimise this too much more. Yes, definately. And if you're going to profile the boot by timestamping serial output - make sure you don't use a buffering terminal emulator such as minicom. Instead I suggest xc or picocom. //Peter -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
