On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 05:05:02PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Now not only a debian users can install it w/o any effords, but Fedora > Linux users too. > > $ sudo yum install flashrom
Great, thanks! I documented this in the wiki, too, see http://linuxbios.org/Flashrom > Optional: > Can you ask upstream to add an license header to udelay.c and include a copy > of Done. > their license in the repository? Done. > There are some build warnings that should be reported upstream: > layout.c: In function 'read_romlayout': > > layout.c:114: warning: ignoring return value of 'fscanf', declared with > attribute warn_unused_result > flashrom.c: In function 'main': > > flashrom.c:402: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with > attribute warn_unused_result > flashrom.c:421: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with > attribute warn_unused_result Which compiler options did you use here? I don't see any warnings using the stock svn code and Makefile. The warnings don't look critical to me, btw. > And another one note - flashrom can't be built at PowerPC arch due to > lack of <sys/io.h>. Does anybody also tried to build it at this arch? > How powerpc-users of LinuxBIOS (if any) flash their machines? Yep, flashrom doesn't build on all platforms, yet. On some it might not even make sense to have flashrom at all (maybe S/390, a mainframe which probably doesn't even have a "BIOS", or at least not in the traditional sense; I'm just guessing, though). See http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=flashrom for the current architecture build status of the Debian package. Any help with porting flashrom is highly welcome! Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
