On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 06:43:40PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >>>>> Probing for Fintek Super I/O at 0x2e... failed > >>>>> Probing for Fintek Super I/O at 0x4e... failed > >>>>> Probing 0x2e, failed (0x22), data returns 0x04 > >>>>> Probing 0x2e, failed (0x22), data returns 0x04 > >>>>> Probing for ITE Super I/O (init=0x87,0x01,0x55,0x55/0xaa) at 0x4e... > >>>>> failed > >>>>> Probing for ITE Super I/O (init=0x87,0x87) at 0x4e... failed > >>>>> Probing 0x2e, failed (0x21), data returns 0x00 > >>>>> Probing 0x2e, failed (0x0e), data returns 0x00 > >>>>> Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x4e... failed > >>>>> Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x4e... failed > >>>>> Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x3f0... failed > >>>>> Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x3f0... failed > >>>>> Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x370... failed > >>>>> Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x370... failed
> >> However, the probing sequence is incomplete (at least when judging it by > >> its output) and Uwe rewrote the probing sequence, so he can take a look > >> at it. > > > > Will do. What do you mean with incomplete? > > The --verbose output needs some more fixing to make it more informative, > > IMO. > > ITE superio probing at 0x2e does not appear in the log above. Ah, yes, indeed. I think it _was_ being probed but not correctly shown in the output. I guess the two 'Probing 0x2e, failed...' lines belong to the ITE 0x2e probing. Anyway, the output should be much better in the latest revision. Can you please repost the --verbose output? Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
