On 12.11.2007 18:07, Marc Jones wrote: > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> >> while taking a look at stage0 and stage1 code in v3, I was surprised to >> see no coherent structure in the code for Geode LX boards. >> While some of this may be due to dead code, I'd like to know: >> * which board can serve as structural reference >> * which board is working best. >> >> Once I know that, I can send cleanup patches and maybe even kill a few >> functions and files. > > I use the amd/norwich and Ron uses the adl/msm800sev. The norwich > mainboard is more generic but they should be very similar to each > other. The artecgroup mainboard is incomplete.
Thanks for the info! I'll proceed with structural unification of the adl/msm800sev and amd/norwich mainboards and make the artec/dbe61 conform to their style. As I work through the code, I will generate a stream of patches, mostly for documentation and cleanup. Do you have boot logs with maximum verbosity for the msm800sev or the norwich? If I can see them, I have a chance to improve debug printout as well. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios