On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:33:29AM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: > So call it what it is - a useful option to LAR to cut out the > objcopy middleman. Which is fine. I'm happy with that.
It's even a bit better since the objcopy would destroy the entry point. > Also, I would abandon the use of .o naming in the LAR - that will > drive others (like me) off course thinking an object file is living > in the LAR, which is not the case. The "object file" is now a subdirectory in the lar - blah.o/segment0 Perhaps too subtle in a new archive format? I think it's OK as long as we have good docs for lar explaining why we've created it and how it is supposed to work. //Peter -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
