On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Eric Seppanen wrote:
> By the way, it isn't terribly hard to get rid of "mkrom" entirely, using
> only the linker to construct the rom image. I've been doing it that way
> for a while. In my opinion, this is more flexible and allows more exotic
> mappings than "mkrom" does, and just seems... cleaner.
works for me. I would love to see mkrom disappear. I am sure it was needed
at some point, but who cares now.
I'd be happy to take in an improved linker script or whatever it takes.
ron
