Re: non-special-case ipl.S

[Eric W. Biederman]

Ronald G Minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> steve james had made a first stab at making ipl.S used for both DoC and
> FLASH cases.
> 
> Just FYI.

Thanks, but for what needs to happen.  ipl.S is essentially fine.
What needs to happen is that crt0.S needs to split up into a generic ipl.S
and a crt0.S for the remaining linuxBIOS.

The generic ipl.S would hold the reset vector and all of that code, and potentially
it would copy linuxBIOS to somplace in memory.

Eric