On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, ramesh bios wrote:

Well, I got things to work in the end by copying the
standard bios's CR bit settings for the W83977AF.
Regretably though, I have gained no understanding of
why or how it's working. Amazingly, the standard bios
sets CR30 on the W83977AF, ie: the RTC enable/disable
bit to disabled. So the RTC appears to increment
properly when that bit is disabled (which makes no
sense to me at all, ie: disable the RTC and it ticks
properly?). When that bit is enabled, and no other
changes, the RTC has weird incrementation behavior.
Almost seemed like random bits in mm:ss were changing.
Also, I never understood why bytes in 0E-7F, the user
ram changes during normal ticking of the clock. Oh
well, it's working now so I guess I'll just push this
mystery to the back of my mind. If anyone happens to
understand this stuff, I'll sleep better once I've
understood this.

Thanks.

--- ramesh bios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was looking through linuxbios' freebios (v1) code
and see the following:

rtc_checksum_valid(PC_CKS_RANGE_START,

PC_CKS_RANGE_END,PC_CKS_LOC);
then
rtc_checksum_valid(LB_CKS_RANGE_START,

LB_CKS_RANGE_END,LB_CKS_LOC);
then finally
rtc_set_checksum(PC_CKS_RANGE_START,

PC_CKS_RANGE_END,PC_CKS_LOC);

I looked in 2.6.11's mc146818 code and I don't see
it
writing a checksum so I'm not certain it's valid to
check for a checksum on boot since stuff like
hwclock
may/would have written to the cmos during normal
operation. Out of curiosity, how come there is a LB
checksum and then a PC checksum and then we write a
PC
checksum at the end. Is it for legacy compatibility,
I
didn't find any mention of it in the mailing list
and
google.

Thanks.

The @clustermatic.org mail address is not to be used anymore.

If anyone knows anything about the above question please put this in the wiki-faq...

Best regards

Peter K


_______________________________________________ LinuxBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Reply via email to