YhLu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > filo is removed too.
Yes. I think if we are going to keep it we need a filo branch that can periodically sync. I'm really not comfortable with filo in there. > more generic support for pci-x, pci-e, ht, Eric, is it support HT-HT > bridge now? A HT-HT bridge should probably work. And if not the infrastructure is complete enough that it should be minor bug fixes to make it work. Yes there is auto-tuning for the all busses I know how to tune so we can get that code out of drivers and into the BIOS which should be current on the errata that affect a given board. > also > > diff -r freebios_lnxi/src/arch/i386/init/ldscript.lb > ../freebios2/src/arch/i386/init/ldscript.lb > 44,49d43 > < > < /* Move up the location counter if the start of the rom section is > < * too low. > < */ > < . = ( ( ( _ROMBASE + ROM_IMAGE_SIZE - 1 ) == 0xffffffff ) && ( . < > 0xffff0000 ) ) ? 0xffff0000 : . ; > < > there is some problem too. > for some 8 way opteron system with romcc > i need > linuxbios_ram > auto.inc ---- it is very big > entry32.inc --- _start is here > failover.inc > jmp auto.inc > out: > _main in crt0.S > > then you will push auto.inc into the top 64k too, but the 64k can not fit. > > So please merge that into main tree... I believe you are asking for a change. But I don't quite follow. Eric _______________________________________________ LinuxBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
