4. it's good, to move hardware mem hole support from raminit.c to northbridge.c, So it will be dynamically. but problem is it will use more MTRRs. So carry_on should be calculated in some way...
YH On 8/9/05, yhlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3. are you sure the node1/core0 could start node1/core1? > Accorinding to my testing last year, node1/core1 only can be started > by node0/core0. > > YH > > > On 8/9/05, yhlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2. you overwite the enable ext id and apic id lifting > > > > YH > > > > On 8/9/05, yhlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 1. write_irq_tables changes is overwrite by you. that will broke all > > > other Opteron MB. Please change that back. > > > > > > YH > > > > > > On 8/9/05, Jason Schildt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > > > > > I've just made a commit up to the public repository from the Linux > > > > Networx repository mirror. The changes only effect Opteron single/dual > > > > core and hdama board specific code. > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > --jason-- > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Jason W. Schildt > > > > LinuxBIOS Software Engineer > > > > Linux Networx > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > LinuxBIOS mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ LinuxBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
