beneo wrote: > Is gcc 3.4 a requirement? > > If not, I would save the trouble and stay with 3.2.2. I didn't encounter any > trouble building LinuxBIOS using this version until now. In another word, > are you absulutely sure the issue I have stated is caused by gcc 3.2.2
gcc keeps changing the names of types of segments we use. I don't recall the rodata.str1.32 segment before, but my memory is hazy. So, no, I don't *think* 3.4 is a requirement -- we built for a long time with 2.95, after all -- but at the same time, 3.4 is known to work ... ro -- LinuxBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
