O.K....that makes sense. When I first installed linuxconf on the 5.1 box,
linuxconf complained that it couldn't find the modules, so I put in the full
path for each one that I was using...and when I upgraded the RH5.0 Alpha
box, I just put the full path in because I had done it on the 5.1
installation.
Should I change the full path to just the module name on both boxes?
Thanks!
>
>The tty message appears when linuxconf is trying to output an error
>message, but can't because stdout and stderr are not a tty and there is no
>controlling tty. I am not sure why it happened on your system. I know it
>can happen when you install linuxconf as part as the linux installation.
>During linuxconf installation, it calls itself to register few modules.
>During an initial install, some libraries are missing and linuxconf can't
>execute properly. But this situation does not happen when you upgrade
>linuxconf (all support libraries are there).
>
>hum...
>
>thinking further
>
>When you configure some modules in linuxconf, you do not have to enter the
>full path and release (unless the module is locate in a special path). All
>you need to do is enter the module name and linuxconf will find the proper
>version to load.
>
>This may explain the error message. Linuxconf was trying to load missing
>modules (from previous linuxconf install) and was signaling errors for
>each. This probably explain the "no tty" message.
>
>
>
>--------------------------
>Jacques Gelinas
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>---
>You are currently subscribed to linuxconf as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe, forward this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
You are currently subscribed to linuxconf as: [[email protected]]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
