If I'm right, as you say, does that mean that there was no memory leaking and this bug can be marked as invalid? Or are you saying that you confirmed it was leaking but revision 351 now stops it from leaking and we should mark it as fix committed?
-- Memory leak while hashing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of LinuxDC++ Team, which is subscribed to LinuxDC++. Status in Linux DC++: Incomplete Bug description: Looks like memory mappings are destroyed on Linux when the file descriptor is closed. This is not the case on FreeBSD. Please see attached patch. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linuxdcpp-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linuxdcpp-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
