Looks like you filed two bugs for the same thing accidentally.
On Sep 17, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Razzloss <[email protected]> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Seems that the lists are still grouped by file. This grouping makes some > sense with the downloads, but not with uploads. The rare occurance where > user downloads a file with same name can probably be fixed by removing > the findFile-call for downloads (since as far as I can tell it's > redundant anyway and only leads to incorrect behavior described > previously. Removing the call of course fixes this only if the core does > something sensible and doesn't clump the download together with the > previous one.). > > But for uploads I really think the grouping should be by user and file. > So that each user downloading file would be added to the list separately > and not like now that all the users are clumped to one single row. With > segmented downloading file/user row would be updated when segment > completes. If this is at all possible with current core without extreme > performace penalties, is a another question. > > ** Affects: linuxdcpp > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > > -- > Finished transfers still grouped by file > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641305 > You received this bug notification because you are a member of LinuxDC++ > Team, which is subscribed to LinuxDC++. > > Status in Linux DC++: New > > Bug description: > Seems that the lists are still grouped by file. This grouping makes some > sense with the downloads, but not with uploads. The rare occurance where user > downloads a file with same name can probably be fixed by removing the > findFile-call for downloads (since as far as I can tell it's redundant anyway > and only leads to incorrect behavior described previously. Removing the call > of course fixes this only if the core does something sensible and doesn't > clump the download together with the previous one.). > > But for uploads I really think the grouping should be by user and file. So > that each user downloading file would be added to the list separately and not > like now that all the users are clumped to one single row. With segmented > downloading file/user row would be updated when segment completes. If this is > at all possible with current core without extreme performace penalties, is a > another question. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linuxdcpp-team > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linuxdcpp-team > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linuxdcpp-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linuxdcpp-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
