Ok, first, stop posting in html.  I can't read it.

Now, mu = micro is pretty consistent with my Physics days.  As for the
fact that the Japanese story having nothing to do with linux - well,
here's a little more insight.

Linux was built by hackers all over the internet.  Hackers don't like
logical inconsistencies in language.  Hence the need for the term mu as a
third alternative to yes and no.  

So you see, mu is very well entwined into the evolution of linux.

Ok, so if I try, I can read.  It's still rude to post in html, which is
why my reply is above the original.

Philip

PS: You're welcome


On Sat, 6 May 2000, vulcan wrote:

> <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
> <html>
> Hi Phil,
> <br>thanks for the nice background. it was interesting and a new info for
> me.
> <br>but, for "mu", won't you think that it is <font size=+3>&micro; </font>of
> plain simple latin. In physics, it is taken as a unit to mean, micron,
> or micro, then it was attached with pc which were initially micro-processor
> micro-computer (against main-frame).
> <p>that means MicroLinux.
> <p>i know it is very boring compared with japanese story.

To subscribe / unsubscribe goto the site www.ilug-bom.org ., click on the mailing list 
button and fill the appropriate information 
and submit. For any other queries contact the ML maintener

Reply via email to