>> The fast track guide says pg 16. top - >> "Free software need not be open source" >> Is this true? I thought free = free to improve and distrib... >> Since this is from Digit, I don't take it on face value.
>As far as the definition goes I don't find any difference between Open >Source Software and Free Software. But Open Source Movement has >different goals than Free Software Movement. I think I read that 'Free' software can be closed - not available for peeking or modification. In which case, it's as good as proprietary/conventional software - I might be missing something here... -- Gishu -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
