Sometime Today, SP cobbled together some glyphs to say:
On 6/29/06, jtd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great. Perhaps he should be reminded about being standards compliant
rather than being compatible with some browsers. However the W3C
HTML standards compliance is absolutely unheard of in colleges and,
I'd hazard to say, even in most organisations. To be honest even I
came to know about standards only recently. And I have been doing HTML
(independently) since 3 years now.
See http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/gbs/gbs.html
Also, AFAIR, Firefox is also not ACID2 compliant. Opera and Konqueror
are. I think the issue in case of these banking sites is cross-browser
scripting. Scripting doesn't really have any standard does it?
There is an ECMAScript specification. Javascript and Actionscript are
ECMAScript implementations. Also read http://www.crockford.com/javascript/
Philip
--
Progress means replacing a theory that is wrong with one more subtly wrong.
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
